Gov. Mark Sanford's income-tax
proposal got roughed up in Senate committees over the past week for good
reason. South Carolina cannot afford it, and it has been touted based on
bogus assumptions.
Sanford wants to reduce the top state income tax rate from 7 percent to
4.8 percent over 10 years -- a move that would cost the state $1 billion.
South Carolina already is behind in paying for schools, roads, bridges,
mental health care, environmental protection, public safety officers,
prisons and higher education. It cannot afford to slash its revenue,
especially in light of the demands of growth and the flimsiness of the
argument to make the cuts.
Sanford says South Carolina could be
more competitive if it had a lower income tax rate. He says Florida
attracts more wealthy people and the industries and jobs they bring with
them because it has no state income tax. But even with its current income
tax rates, South Carolina's overall tax burden is among America's lowest.
Recent research by the state Board of Economic Advisors shows that the
tax burden in Florida is higher than South Carolina in many other ways,
including cigarette tax, a tax on local phone calls, a tax on home
satellite television service, a tax on outpatient hospital services and
drastically higher property taxes.
Beaufort County has for decades attracted some of the brightest, most
successful retirees in America. Many of them come because of the low
taxes. Few of them have spawned new industries that create local jobs,
though they have spawned a sprawling service industry with many low-end
jobs.
And while the retirees bring many assets to the community -- including
immeasurable contributions to civic and social life -- they also bring new
demands for expensive government services. Roads and bridges are a prime
example, along with a need for more police, schools, health care, judicial
services, parks and recreation, etc.
The Senate has a better plan. It addresses the legitimate problem
brought forward by the governor without breaking the bank. A plan approved
by the Finance Committee would put small businesses on a level playing
field when paying corporate taxes. It cuts the top rate small business
owners pay from 7 percent to 5 percent, which is the same rate
corporations pay on their profits. That inequity needs to be fixed,
especially since small business is the backbone of the local and state
economies.
That move will cost about $129 million yearly when fully implemented in
four years. The state can afford that, and it will do what the governor
wants -- encourage and reward entrepreneurship.